UNEMPLOYMENT

We have a crisis. There is no other term to describe it. 9 milion people unemployed is actually too big to blog about, too indescribable for words and could simply be imagined as a sea of despair.

You and I get out of bed every morning with work to attend to. For stay-at-home moms, it’s getting kids nourished and ready for school. For businessmen, it’s off to work and the stress of the day. Whatever it is, it lends meaning to life and creates the routine so many of us need to live and be ourselves.

What of those who do not enjoy employment? I would put to you, they:

  • Have no or little money.
  • Have little that it is required to be bought, starting with food.
  • Have no or little dignity.

The first “have not’s” are so obvious that they need no describing and frankly, I’m not in a position to even try; the Afrikaans word “ellende” comes to mind, that sense of utter desperation. But as regards dignity, let me try a little to give flesh to its absence. I can remember when the homeloan business was shut down in Nedbank and the sales force found itself being retrenched. Every time I met one of my team, my message was: “Don’t let anyone take away your dignity; it belongs to you and only you can give it away.” It truly was the lasting thought on my mind as I too departed from the company that had employed me for 20 years; that retrenchment programme was anathema to me and not being retrenched myself, I resigned to pursue my own origination business. The rest is history, so they say.

It seems to me that the first thing unemployment depletes is dignity. How do you explain to your family that tonight there is no food on the table? With whom and how do you share what little you may have? How do you pay your debts as little as they may be in the scheme of things? The mind boggles at the reality and those of you reading this who have experienced the chilling wind of unemployment, you would be able to best describe the desperation into which you plunge. It must be incredibly difficult to avoid the indignity of your circumstances. Statistically, over 9m (and growing) people face this debilitation every day. I’ll never forget getting to know my people in the meat business – the first time I had worked with who we term as “labour”. I learnt they were wonderful people with hopes and dreams just like mine – a brighter future, a home, education for their kids. No airs and graces just an exceptional work ethic every day under trying circumstances. I tried many times to enable some of them to lift their circumstances and become entrepreneurs. In the meat business that’s fairly easy, all kinds of offal, stewing bones, offcuts and over-stock exists and the market for its sale was right where they lived. Very few ever saw the vision of beginning small and possibly growing a significant business though some went off into Legal work and the Metro police so good for them. We talked about it and encouraged it, but little seemed to bear significant fruit. One thing I think I learned then is that poverty constricts the poor and their inner belief of potential is strangled by constant negative feedback – I battle for the right words, but knowing some people come out of poverty in rags-to-riches stories, my sense is that we know them because they are so exceptional. On the other hand, the masses of poverty-stricken individuals and families have not enough dignity to rise beyond simply struggling to stay alive themselves every day. I often say “I have never been poor” implying that I just have no idea what it’s like. Life was never rich and everything our family had and now has, has been worked hard for and I’m sure most of you identify with that upbringing. But in it was the power of dignity that knew it could reach for a dream and have a probability of success, whatever that means to each of us.

As I drive past Atterigeville and to Cape Town from time to time, I am aware of the shattered dreams of many of our people. The government has not provided the promise and the land grabs have managed only to give 3X3 square meters shelter with not even a cabbage able to be grown in the yard. Abject poverty is a blight and disgrace upon our land and, indeed, the “struggle” which fought for so much more than this, has really failed them. And demagogues and populists only continue to crash the economy into its base elements along socialist lines and towards a possible failed state. I’ve just read Fighting for the Dream by RW Johnson and have started People’s War by Anthea Jeffery – both books speak to the black hole of National Democratic Revolution philosophy. Radical change is needed for radical unemployment; the NDR is not that kind of change.

This is not a rant but just a record of the position we all know we’re in coupled with some personal insights with which you’re welcome to disagree. But on the other hand, for all I seem to see in even my few travels, there is obviously a huge informal sector that I simply don’t know. Every day men and women are raising themselves from abject poverty with the guts and determination to eke out a living for themselves and their families. As economist and banker, I was dumbfounded by an article by GG Alcock about the Informal sector of our economy. What also struck me is that we think about people earning R30 per day just to stay alive but he knows “Vetkoek” ladies making R6000 per day literally on the streets. It is not taxable income I’m sure but she feeds another 5 people and their families and no doubt does well for herself. What’s also impressive here is the incredibly hard work of this kitchen and sales force; I couldn’t make 12 koeksisters a day never mind 6000 vetkoeks. Strength to your arm Lady, whoever you are, you make us in the formal sector proud!

Enjoy the article… and then an optimistic closing comment.

 

SHATTERING THE MYTH OF HIGH UNEMPLOYMENT RATE: WHY 29% CLOSER TO 12%

19th August 2019 by Jackie Cameron

High unemployment is often quoted as the reason for emigration from South Africa. But, look beneath the official statistics and you will see a vibrant economy built by tens of thousands of small business operators and entrepreneurs. This is the message that GG Alcock, who calls himself a white Zulu after being brought up in a rural community, is bringing home to economists. His number-crunching makes for fascinating reading. Looking at the details of the street vendors and small-time landlords, the incomes being generated are fairly impressive – and certainly not just subsistence living. GG Alcock reckons it is time to take a fresh look at the South African economy and realise that the statistics being bandied about cannot be true. – Jackie Cameron

 

ANGINAM’SEBENZI, NGIYASEBENZA. I DON’T HAVE A JOB, I WORK!

By GG Alcock*

In the crescendo of shock and horror about unemployment of 29% I must disagree with these numbers.

These numbers should be prefaced by the word “formal” unemployment.

GG Alcock pictured centre
GG Alcock pictured centre. (Source: Facebook) 

I have written about the huge scale of informal businesses at some length in my books Kasinomics and Kasinomic Revolution. There are a multitude of informal and kasi businesses – some small, some pretty large – which are not measured in unemployment stats.

This is for a few reasons why they are not considered:

  1. They are not measured by formal research;
  2. They are considered survivalist or subsistence business people who would at the drop of a hat accept a formal job if they could have one (which is total bull);
  3. They do not consider themselves employed as they do not have a payslip or work for a boss which defines what a job is, they say “anginamsebenzi, ngiyasebenza”;
  4. They operate in an informal and largely invisible economy, well invisible to the formal world. The former Minister of Small Business even said “we need to create more entrepreneurs in the township”. Astounding there are tens of thousands of entrepreneurs and micro businesses out there in the informal and kasi sectors. 

In a recent Kyknet show on the informal economy and youth unemployment the programme asked me to assist them to interview some young entrepreneurs. One I connected them with was a lady from Limpopo who sells vetkoek in downtown Joburg. This young 24-year-old sells 6,000 vetkoek a day for R1 each and employs 5 staff, one her brother. She turned to vetkoek selling because she could not find a formal job. She definitely was not measured as employed in the stats nor were her 5 staff.

What about income generating activities, are these viewed as jobs? I wrote in Kasinomic Revolution about a gogo who earns around R1,600 a month in old age pension. Yet she rents out a shisanyama and a hair salon in front of her little house for R1,500 each and three backrooms for R1,200, R900 and R900. So, she earns an additional R6,000 a month from rental. Let’s briefly look at the kasi rental sector. The immigrant spaza sector rent their stores from South Africans, paying between R2,500 to R25,000 for the store rental depending on the size. I estimated the rental income to South Africans is in the vicinity of R30bn a year. That’s a lot of good money being earned. Pity this is not featured in xenophobic rants about immigrants taking jobs.

And backroom rental? Practically every single township home has a back room, a garage-sized room rented or occupied by extended family and often a mix of both. I estimated that over and above the rental of spazas, backroom residential rental brings in another R20bn a year.

So are the more than 20,000 hair salon owners employed or are their stylists who in kasi style rent stations from the salon owner in a gig economy type arrangement. They are not employed but each stylist who rents a station in the salon is self-employed making anything from R5,000 to R15,000 a month in styling, nails, extensions etc.

What about the fast food sector in the townships, what I call kasi kos with 50,000 outlets selling kotas, amaplati, inhloko, isibindi, isishebo, burgers, chicken dust, mogodu. A sector employing 200,000 odd staff “informally” and turning over in excess of R85bn a year. Are they all unemployed?

Or the muti sector, inyangas and sangomas dispensing herbal plant based concoctions estimated in 2004 to be worth R3bn a year and employing 150,000 plus herbalists.

What about the school mamas, the school tuckshops of the townships, I wrote in Kasinomic Revolution of a lady in Thembisa who has been selling food and snacks at the same school for 26 years, earning R6,000 a month in profits. She has put her two kids through university and her husband has been unemployed the whole time. There are 12,000 odd township schools each with 5-8 school mamas, if each only earn R3,000 a month (the minimum wage for domestics) then that is a sector worth easily R2bn a year in incomes. But these school mamas are unemployed, aren’t they?

I am not even going to mention the auto sector with its kasi mechanics, panel beating, car washes etc.; nor the tavern sector; nor the township building and support sectors such as electricians, plumbers, builders, tilers; nor the internet cafes or goat farmers; I can go on.

We are NEVER going to create a million jobs in the formal sector no matter how many electoral manifestos or government promises are made in this regard. Initiatives like the YES programme are designed to encourage mentorship, internship and job learnership opportunities in the formal sector which is shedding jobs. Why would you get a job shadowing or intern opportunity at Standard Bank while they are closing branches and retrenching staff as an example.

The informal sector is remarkably similar to the gig economy. While governments and municipalities are trying to regulate or limit AirBnB, Uber etc these are the economies of the future which should be supported (and taxed) as the future employers and economies.

The informal sector is where the opportunity is, we need to bring the informal economy into the formal economy, not by formalising but by creating fostering and growth environments.

My simple starting point and three steps to addressing formal unemployment is about growing and giving security to the informal sector so that it can grow, so that it can formalise, so that the participants have security and thus invest more into their businesses, and so that there is an incentive for this economic sector to pay rent, tax, PAYE etc:

  1. Give security of tenure through a PTO (permission to occupy) type mechanic, to informal traders and in exchange charge rental. An astonishing example of this is the Warwick Street Market in Durban with work done by the Asiye Etafuleni organisationin cooperation with the municipality.
  2. Venture capital type credit for small businesses allowing them to expand; get stock and grow. Utilising different means to measure credit worthiness and profitability to existing models. As an example, the vetkoek seller I described purchases 50 x 12.5kg bags of flour a week from a local wholesaler. It is very easy to measure these input costs and do a simple extrapolation to calculate margins and as such valuate these businesses for credit.
  3. BEE type model for immigrant traders. These traders are going nowhere, let’s bring them into the economy and let them add value. This simple mechanic would offer, business licences, residency etc in exchange for the outlet following a BEE type code earning points for e.g. pay VAT and Tax, pay rental to a South African at a set rental rate, employ x amount of South African staff,  procure security, transport services etc from a South African small business. 

I reckon real unemployment i.e. where the person has no income generating opportunity or income for any form of permanent work, is probably closer to 12%. Prove me wrong if you can?

Instead of banging our heads against the formal sector wall doing the same thing over and over expecting a different result why don’t we look for solutions which assist the largely informal Kasinomic sector? The economy does not belong only to the formal sector. Prepare for a Kasinomic Revolution.

*GG Alcock has been at times a shebeen owner, political activist, community worker and African adventurer, and more recently the founder of Minanawe Marketing, a leading marketing agency in the mass market

If you don’t know this man as I’m embarrassed to admit myself, he is a breath of crystal-fresh air; the kind of almost-unique man who has taken the trouble, like Johnny Clegg, to live with and understand the majority of our population. Imagine [a word I use often], an education system to have given these brilliant entrepreneurs a head start in life. Imagine mentors taking these businesses to great heights starting with a dream of what could be and then teaching what is necessary to finance and build a business out of its seams. But even while we allow our imagination to run, what these people do not need to do is steal for a living; they have self-induced motivation and dignity pouring out of them. They are part of the future of this State and not a product of it corruption and social torture. How do you know that maybe they’re the homeowners of the future or, at least, that they’re growing an educated and driven population of kids who could be.

The question then remains, “What about me [and you]?” As I often say, “Any idiot can tell me the problem! I need people who can tell me the solution!” Look at my first few passages to this blog. Were you nodding your head and agreeing with me as we slipped into depression and “I told you so” together? Or, are you part of the solution? Finding answers, employing people for the best salary you can pay, talking to them courteously and meaningfully to lift their spirits into dignity and possibility thinking. Or, are you or I just miserable. I have a dear friend who is determined to sell his house and move to Scotland to be close to his kids who have moved offshore. But instead of bitching constantly about the country, he employed Alex and then helped fund him to get to and start a subsistence farm back in Malawi. Now he has employed Sam and I bet he’ll help him along the way as well. Who knows what my friend’s “hustle while you wait” positive attitude may mean to these two men who are fighting to lift themselves from economic refugee status to something better?

Hope you and I “get my drift” and do as much as we moan while we’re blessed with health and life to be ourselves and so much more.

Yours in Property.

HOUSE PRICE REALITIES

I emailed Vincent the other day to ask for blog titles. Given the news and views in the market at the moment I’m scratching my head for subjects.

I really enjoyed writing the Land series. Its foundation, its worth and why, and the proposals which unfortunately seem to result in an inevitable amendment to Section 25 of our Constitution, were really interesting to uncover. I had no feedback from anyone but I hope you found it an interesting journey.

You read every day about slow-moving house prices but I’ll make a few points from some recent research papers. Before I do that, I’m going to refer to an article [I cannot find it, for the life of me!!] that I read about the Eastern seaboard house prices. Many examples of recent listings or sales were mentioned by a leading estate agency brand where prices have been slashed, but like R27m to R15m and R37m to R25m slashed, with two interesting conclusions. The first was the sensationalism of the price cuts and the second, the bargain-buying opportunity. The first was “sensational” to say the least – a statement of fact with pictures of these beautiful homes at early-2000 prices, and an amazing interpretation of why the prices have been drastically cut, some of it economic and other social reasons but nothing too serious. But then came the “reason to buy” and “this is your last chance at these prices” section which was spin of the highest order. The bottom line is, if you don’t buy now you may never be able to afford that house again. So com’on, buy now folks while they’re dirt cheap! It reminds me of someone prepared to pay R37000 per month for an apartment in the Waterfront that was worth R22m. That’s a 2% annual return for the owner on the face of it. But really, who have R15-R25+ million to spend on a holiday home? What would the “bargain” house really give you on Air BnB? And what about the service and maintenance costs on the edge of the sea? The reason for the collapse [because that’s what those restated prices represent] is cost of maintaining a second property in the prevailing economy and, I’m sure, the property risk of ownership in SA given EWC fears and even the desire to emigrate to get away from it all. And finally, as I read the article, it was blatantly obvious to me that the Rich are getting poorer in Rand terms but they still had assets to be seen to play the high life.

Really a telling story whatever your opinion or station in life.

Back to the realm of the normal……….

Standard Bank’s Property Research on 6 August 2019 is titled, House price growth still constrained, has a few pointers:

 

  • House prices slightly accelerated to 3.9% y/y in July from 3.8% y/y (previously 3.7% y/y) in June. Nevertheless, when adjusted for inflation, house prices moderately declined 0.5% y/y (using July’s inflation forecast) after declining 0.7% y/y in June. Year-to-date, house prices have only increased by 4.1% y/y compared to 5.6% y/y in the corresponding period last year. What I read from this is the good news that house prices are continuing to rise even though the upper-end market is being ravaged by price cuts.

 

  • The national median house price was R1,017,041 in July (from R1,009,641 in June), with the Western Cape median house price 37.4% above the national median house price at R1,394,298. In Gauteng it was 3.8% below the national median; KwaZulu-Natal 4.8% above the national median; and Free State, 27.9% below the national median. Fair to say that the Cape still carries a premium to the rest of the country which it has built up over decades of good management and almost-unique scenery.

 

  • Our view is maintained, real house prices are essentially still moving sideways, and we still see a lack of robust growth in the near-term. At the moment, tracking inflation is as good as it gets but inflation has always represented a bad investment and we all know, above-inflation is required to maintain our status quo. You could certainly have done better in Bonds or Preference Shares over the last 4 years or so.

 

Standard Bank, as usual, makes some very interesting points though:

  • The 0.25% interest reduction may not do anything to house prices but it’s a damn side better than an equal but opposite increase.

 

  • The cut is not sufficient to overcome the undermining of confidence caused by our politics, but it does serve to remind me, as does his re-appointment, that Lesetja Kganyago, the SARB Governor, is a pre-eminent resource in our country.

 

  • This [the above two points] is further reinforced by the rising unemployment rate and the bleak prospects for employment and economic growth. To put it into perspective, when the unemployment rate increased to 29.0% in 2Q19, employment for those between ages 25 – 34 declined by 72 000 y/y, and for those between ages 35 – 44, declined by 59 000 y/y. Arguably, these are the group of people at a crucial stage of their lives who should at least be purchasing their first homes or already paying back mortgages. These statistics struck me as powerful. As much as we talk a better life for all, the “all” that matter most in home ownership are being deprived of this basic investment. This is unfortunately not a zero-sum game – those deprived of buying a home economically demand a home from taxpayers who just can’t cough any more than even that required to keep SOE’s in business. The American Dream taught us that if you want people to own a home, give them quality work and then watch the virtuous spiral that results as the economy literally catches alight with developmental activity.

 

  • Regrettably, this is not a short game. World economic growth prospects remain mired in Trade Wars and Immigration issues which have precipitated the likes of Brexit and its disruption in Europe. Down here, I’m always reminded of the opportunity cost of the inward focus [political warfare and lawfare] of our parliament who are our representatives who serve to drive the nation forward. Leaders, don’t underestimate your cost to this nation and her childrens’ children!

 

  • To this point, Standard Bank has a revised forecast of 0.6% this year.

 

In case you think I’m negative, I’m not. Like the article I alluded to earlier, I could say this is a good time to buy buy-to-let flats from mortgage-distressed sellers but I’ll spare you the “charm”. But this much I will say, given that we have the dire economic issues we have, given that our currency is one of the most open and therefore most traded currencies in the world, and given that Moody’s have issued warnings to us, we have done a lot in this year of which we can be proud. Regrettably, those initiatives are backward-facing and building from a “hollowed-out” basin of human capital with integrity, but they have been brave and courageous initiatives by gutsy men and women.

 

“Never give up! Never give up! I say, Never give up!” said Winston Churchill to schoolchildren in his finest hours.

 

Yours in Property.

Land [Part 4]

We have journeyed through the Land issue of our country.

No matter how well-informed, no one knows who was where when [Part 1].

The issue may boil down to the Cultural value of land, the Commercial value of land and the Capital value of land. These three characteristics were covered in Parts 2&3.

My opinion is not the “law” so please forgive me if you have a different version. In fact, let me know if you disagree and we can chat. As usual, I would love to learn.

But something has just arrived and it bears mention. It is the latest version of EWC land and it looks far less inflammatory than what we have feared. Let’s have a look at the article……..

BusinessTech 29 July 2019, reported:

“The presidential advisory committee has published its report on land expropriation without compensation.

The report makes a number of recommendations on land in South Africa –  including provision for the establishment of an integrated planning system’ which will be responsible for the planning and coordination of the land expropriation process.

The report also calls for the speedy distribution of land that is already owned by the government, as well as ‘voluntary donations’ from various sources such as churches, mining houses, and commercial farmers.

In line with the current Expropriation Bill that is being considered by parliament, the report suggests that the conditions for land expropriation without compensation, should include:

  • Where land is occupied or used by a labour tenant;
  • Where land is held for speculative purposes;
  • Where land is state-owned or owned by a state-owned entity;
  • Where the owner has abandoned the land; and
  • Where the market value of the land is equivalent to or less than the present value of direct state investment or subsidy in the acquisition and beneficial capital improvement of the land.

Over and above these conditions, the report suggests that expropriation without compensation also applies in the following circumstances.

  • Hopelessly indebted land;
  • Land obtained through criminal activity;
  • Informal settlement areas;
  • Inner-city buildings with absentee landlords;
  • Land donations (as a form of EWC); and
  • Farm equity schemes.

What happens next?

Last week, the National Assembly has agreed to establish a multiparty committee to introduce legislation amending section 25 of the constitution.

This committee will draw on the findings of this report as well as previous studies, and past legislation to come up with a new bill which covers the above issues.

The new committee will report back to the National Assembly by 31 March 2020, and will and be composed of 11 voting members and 14 non-voting members.

Voting members will be drawn from the African National Congress (6), the Democratic Alliance (2), the Economic Freedom Fighters (1) and other parties (2).

The 14 non-voting members of the National Assembly, will comprise of the African National Congress (2), Democratic Alliance (1), Economic Freedom Fighters (1) and other parties (10).

Once the bill has been finalised it will be gazetted and undergo a full public consultation process.

This means that the earliest that land expropriation can be introduced is mid-2020. However, it will likely take much longer as the bill will face intense scrutiny from the opposition parties and members of the public.”

A couple of points that will also conclude this resume of Land, that it exists, how it is transformed culturally or commercially to have “meaning” and that it is the source of the most vicious tension at this point in time in South Africa. The land redistribution issue sorted, we would be able to stop focussing on it as a distraction and we could focus on the real issue, its productive use for food, industry and habitat. If not sorted, some of us fear it will disintegrate into civil war and scorched earth to the detriment of All. But my fear is that it gives rise to the biggest impediment to future growth and prosperity; the reason for every failure and the balm that we use to soothe our consciences when we continue failing to deliver to our people. To this point, I understand, I really do and accept, that apartheid was a social, inhumane disaster but it is no longer the reason for every cock-up in this country starting with the school book fiasco of a few years ago where our erstwhile president blamed apartheid, to the disgusting rape of VBS bank by greedy, self-seeking individuals that got onto a “scheme” of mega-returns. You should all be bloody ashamed of yourselves and jailed immediately! Like the game of Monopoly, Go to Jail Do Not Pass Go.

That stuff off my mind, a few points:

  • The Land proposals above don’t seem inflammatory by any means. I guess there may be some who have farm in old trusts and therefore will be aggrieved by losing them but, to the point, land must be productive or really, it has little value beyond its cultural value.
  • The use of State land is significant. Unfortunately, it may include Green Belts, like Emmarentia Lake, in its ambit. So, just by the way, you can buy plots in England through St James Capital Group that are farms at this stage that need to be converted into development land. The fight in Britain to preserve green belts is huge and can delay rezoning by a decade. In other words, we’re not the only country in the world with a housing backlog and protestations against affordable housing; the UK is 3 million houses short and fighting to deliver.
  • Allied to this is the issue of affordable housing where “I” live. It will destroy the value of my property, you know? Sadly, collateral damage is unavoidable if we are to readdress the disadvantages of the past and you or I may be caught in the cross-fire.
  • That said, one of the concerns is that land invasion will be enflamed by reckless demagogues who drive “their people” to invade land. The only solution to this is the voice of reason, followed by the rule of Law, followed by forced eviction. We have watched this movie in Hermanus. It is ugly and municipalities have inadequate resources to begin the negotiation process and then no power to enforce the law and then poor Police resources as a last resort. It is ugly and may be coming to your town soon; don’t be naïve. However, once all attempts failed and Dubai [a pristine, 10th biggest Milkwood forest in the world now burnt, on the beach and actually owned by a private company who failed to evict; as well as the site for the future municipal desalination plant] was occupied by 300+ shacks, it has been reported that a proper multi-use development will be built in due course – so hope remains!

The problem will fester on unless we solve it. Solving it will be tough and well-nigh impossible in some cases. It will call for cool heads and warm hearts. Money will need to be found so as to follow through on well-intended land redistribution. Our negativity will need to be tempered by practical realization but if we don’t commence the process it will be a sore point from generation to generation. I think it’s reached the point where politicians are so hell-bent on winning votes that even if they got huge swathes of land, their “people” would reject their plots and swop them for a stable, proper job in the city with a pension and medical aid. As always, time will tell.

But what is reassuring about the list above is that honest, hard-working, bond-paying home owners will still have their properties. They will go to work every day, their kids will grow tall and educate, and their capital value will be realised by maintaining their property and selling it in a process which is world class. You and I fit into this mould and we, in the property industry, ensure the dream every day for every kind of person and family. Don’t allow the “noise” to cripple your motivation to get up in the morning and “house the nation”. Right here in Hermanus, Greeff Properties is opening for the first time; goodie for them as they recognise that “this too will pass”.

Homeloan Junction is in this with you. Fully invested but not naive, committed responsibly and solely to the good of the industry and to thriving for many years to come.

Speak to us and let us surprise you with what we can deliver to your business.

Yours in Property.

LAND [Part 3]

We discussed Culture and Commerciality as part of the value of land in Part 2 of our blog on Land.

We begin with Capital in this feature.

CAPITAL: Us laymen understand this best. But in order to gain a full perspective, we will incorporate the other two.

I was once corrected when I told a group that their home is their biggest asset. “No’, said one participant, explaining that their pension was bigger. So, the moral of the story, don’t job-hop! Our houses are big investments and I know of no one who has decided never to buy. Our objective is to buy a home as soon as possible, pay off the bond and then enjoy the proceeds from its sale one day to supplement our retirement funds. In between, we may change homes in life-stages moving up the ladder of size and in the end, downscaling for reality. The theory is that our homes will appreciate in value and that that accretion of capital will complement our savings in other vehicles both onshore and offshore. But there are some other considerations that come into play so let’s explore them.

Robert Kyosaki of Rich Dad Poor Dad fame, taught me a thing or two when he postulated, against all the current wisdom, that a house is a liability and not an asset. In fact, he made the point repeatedly (even annoying NYSE and the influential National Association of Realtors) that any asset which does not yield an income, is naturally a liability. I have alluded to him so often over my years of writing blogs as his wisdom is so unconventional but completely unassailable. This is especially the case when property is not selling almost at any price – I have two friends who right now are experiencing this. It feels like, “There are just no buyers” said one of them recently. Kyosaki’s view was simple, if you wanted to own a Porsche, take the cashflow you would spend and buy a factory. Then as the factory’s tenant paid off the bond, use the net proceeds to buy the Porsche. Thus, for a little deferred satisfaction, you had the factory and the Porsche, and you would not feel the liability that we all know a Porsche is. Being Head of Homeloans and a proud homeowner, this was unbelievable news to me. But even sitting here looking onto my garden, it’s quite obvious that this home could make a lot of money on AirBnB that we don’t have by living in it, and re-painting it last year was costly not income-generating. Point is, we don’t think like this [or even agree with Kyosaki] when our homes are growing at 8+% compounded every year. It’s only when that rate of growth collapses and even selling your house, [pointing to property’s illiquid nature; never mind having to perhaps pay a bond], becomes very remote, that we have this discussion. The Western Cape has felt the cold wind that has chilled the Gauteng property market for years. To sum it up, if your house is growing at 8+% in value every year it more than mitigates the cost of maintenance and that makes it an investment amongst other investments. Capital is often locked up in an asset.

Another point is land ownership. Your home is built on land and how that land is owned or regulated is important to it and your houses’ capital value. The 99-year Lease has always been the nemesis of the banks, but 99 years is a seriously long time. A bond of thirty years would fit into it 3 times and only with the last would the bondholder need to worry about value in terms of continuity of tenure. Take the famous example of the Duke of Westminster who owns 300 acres of London being Mayfair and Belgravia. It’s worth UKP10bn and is leased long-term to everyone who lives or trades in the area. I know when I got back from Mauritius last year that I mentioned their 60-year lease form of land ownership nationally. Ownership methods in South Africa fall into a number of categories and let’s look into them for the sake of understanding Capital value.

Freehold: This form of ownership is common, and the title of ownership is registered in the Deeds Office. It gives you unfettered ability to do whatever you like with your property so long as you pay for services and remain within municipal bylaws. Your house is your castle and you can add on, paint and sell at a reasonable whim. All of the capital loss and appreciation accrues to the owner; but the point for our conversation is that the capital does that because you own the land.

Rental: In this case someone else owns the property and title never transfers. But for certain exceptions contained in the written and signed [now a law that it exists ie verbal lease agreements are not permitted] Lease agreement, maintenance, services [normally excluding electricity and water] and any depreciation or accretion of value are the responsibility and right of the owner. In short, the tenant never has any capital opportunity but also seldom takes any significant maintenance responsibility. In fact, in most leases, the tenant must return the property to the landlord in the same condition they initially received it, wear and tear aside.

Cluster: This is a form of ownership akin to freehold but where a form of community living is intended. The primary purpose is shared security, but the style also became popular when cities began to encourage densification so as to alleviate urban sprawl. In this case a small communal area levy is paid normally to an innocuous Home Ownership Association [HOA] for caretaking of the common areas such as parks, pavements, internal roads and water features. But you are constrained by the Estate Guidelines if you want to alter your dwelling, sometimes even to the colour of the paint. It can be annoying but normally neighbours become friends, and everything can be handled as amicably as possible. As regards capital upon sale, it belongs to the seller but be careful of “estate levies”. Ours is 0.25% and clearly agreed and signed at exception, however, I have family who were stung 12% upon sale and shocked at the loss they suffered!

Sectional Title: Marina Constas of BBM Attorneys wrote a book almost 20 years ago titled, Demystifying Sectional Title, which is a good read if you’re interested. To sum up this form of ownership, she writes, “Complex living is…..complex.” This form of ownership extends to cluster-type developments, semi-detached and high-rise buildings. The example right at the beginning of this blog series, the owner of a unit on floor 17 of the Michaelangelo Towers, is typical of sectional title. Great for security, a lower cost of building [though you seldom feel that!], and capital accretion. The Body Corporate [BC] is accountable for property maintenance and disasters and must insure for these and is also accountable for the integrity of the common areas ie as regards maintenance and normal use. The biggest problem comes in when self-destruction is caused to the property or when the BC funds deplete. Banks will not lend into a defunct BC balance sheet and nor should you consider buying into such a complex; it’s bad news and an individual owner has little influence in the Scheme. But all things going well, sectional title has served property ownership well so far in our country. Capital belongs to the owner.

Leasehold: I think we have covered this style of ownership implicitly above. However, I was surprised to learn that Waterfall Estate in Midrand is a leasehold property. I don’t have the detail, if I’m correct, but it would be honestly disclosed, I’m sure. Capital is the owners but beware being the last owner before the long-term lease ends. Logic says the Lessor will simply extend the lease as happens in the Duke’s case but practice could be different.

Fractions: This form of ownership, quite distinct from timeshare, is excellent if properly managed and let [in a rental pool] and can give the fraction owner a good return on investment in a sough-after complex. Its downside lies in the unavailability of funding due its “shareblock” characteristics so only cash buyers can participate. In my experience, very little capital accretion occurs, and the ownership style is recommended only amongst “friends” and for vacational properties. Certain of the Sandton apartment complexes allow for units purchased to be aggregated in a rental pool in the context of a hotel and conference center. Capital in the Park in Sandton is such a successful development, but such schemes are not fractions but rather a play on sectional title with a formal rental pool.

No one blinks an eyelid with any of these examples for one reason and one reason only: Consistency of Policy. It is the inconsistency of policy, the willingness to amend Section 25 of the Constitution, which now seems a certainty, that has spooked the property market in South Africa. “Spooked” is a euphemism for the anger, fear and frustration that land ownership may no longer be sacrosanct in law and that expropriation with compensation may no longer be engraved in every property transaction since the beginning of property title. No power line, railway or road has been built that has not implied expropriation in their path. I give you some land and I am compensated using a Sworn Appraiser’s valuation. The problem now is dispossession and the critical need to re-address the past as it is understood by the majority of our citizens. There lies the aggravating rub and I must say, the only government I would trust with the process if it has to go ahead, is one headed by Cyril Ramaphosa. I would rather the land redistribution legislation do its proper work but if something more radical [which I do not believe] is required, he should head it. What the future holds is precarious our beautiful, tortured country is suffering from deep uncertainty.

Also, for me at the heart of this issue where we have explored the wealth creating potential of land ownership, is the fact that land redistribution has not worked, that many units in the likes of Soweto are still not owned, and that tribal lands remain under the rental control of chiefs. Bottom line, no capital has been built in these three areas and only Culture is served by tribal lands. The downright hypocrisy of these issues against the willingness to “bet the bank” with expropriation without compensation [EWC], is anathema to me. Get land redistribution working with proven models in place that can be scaled then we can stomach EWC as a nation. Get the title deeds of so-called “matchbox” houses delivered then we can stomach EWC as a nation. Get some form of land value and “sectional title” into tribal lands so tenants have wealth creating and not just subsistence benefits from their use of their land and then we can stomach EWC as a nation. And a final bet I would wager is that those initiatives would solve so many problems that we would never need to radicalise uncompensated land expropriation.

Long may the property industry last!

Yours in Property.

LAND [Part 2]

From Biznews, 19 July 2019.

What a compliment to a man who has fought his fight in a team of fighters to retain the independence of the SARB. Thank you for the rate cut, Mr Governor, But even more so, Thank you for fighting for what is right….

“Lesetja Kganyago has had a tough time of it. With the economy tanking, some have been calling for a political takeover of the SA Reserve Bank (SARB) in order to, one assumes, print money in the hope of inflating our way to prosperity, or at the very least, tweak the central bank’s mandate to focus more on growth.
In his role as governor, Kganyago has been a powerful voice for SARB independence. That’s no small feat at a time when central banks are under political pressure from Turkey (where the governor of the central bank was summarily fired by the Erdogan) to the US (where Trump has been giving Powell a rough ride). SA is in the fortunate position of having an independent, technocratic central bank, and Kganyago is working hard to retain that.
Which brings us to yesterday’s rate cut. While some may see political pressure in the decision, the monetary policy statement clearly outlines a balanced and rational case for a cut. With the economy contra Best”
Felicity

The first Land read was interesting, hey? I mentioned Bulpin, the author, to my well-read, elderly neighbour and he said he certainly knew of him in his day; a good author he said. At least that gives me some comfort as to source.

Given that we are not going to debate who was where when, I’d like to unravel a little of the emotion around land. On the one hand, the owner of a unit on the 17th floor, The Michael Angelo, ultra-luxury apartments in Sandton, surely does not care about the value of the land? That problem was solved 10 years ago when the developer bought a plot and began building a high-rise. On the other hand, does the person who “owns” a piece of “heaven” on the beach along the Wild Coast where he has a rudimentary two bedroom house and a 3-cow herd of cattle and 15 chickens also doesn’t care about the land; he rents it from his tribal leader and never achieves value other than the subsistence farmer that he is? And what about the great 12000Ha farms in the Karoo that can sustain a herd of sheep and a few other animals in the vicinity of the homestead? And finally, the Top Road, Clifton owners who have multi-million homes with views to suit?

In order to do some justice to the effort, let’s divide the thoughts into:

Culture

Commercial

Capital.

CULTURE: [I need to declare my cultural heritage and the bias it brings. I am English speaking, over 60 years of age and first-generation South African with parents from the UK. Naturally, I have a view of the world that may not reflect all my readers’ and hence there may be bias for which I apologise.]

This topic is serious and emotional. It probably speaks to the heart of the Land issue in South Africa. The dispossessed now have protagonists of their cause – EFF and Black First Land First, as front-runners. Unlike Australia, New Zealand and the United States, for example, we had the word Apartheid applied by Europe (as I understand its source) as we made a science of social engineering. The demographics of apartheid and the grande design of separation-with-a-purpose, or separate development in homelands, was never going to make muster. It was hated, exploited and overcome after years of the struggle and we will never return to its indignity and spatial dynamics again. The dispossessed are aggrieved deep into their souls and the land-holders are threatened to the nth degree. But somehow, this matter needs to be resolved and we live in future imperfect as our President attempts to make inroads into the problem. No wonder he says one thing to one constituency and another thing to the next constituency – he probably, better than many of us reading this, truly knows how hard the task will be to keep everyone satisfied and the economy on an even keel at the same time. Our “right” to land was destroyed when strangers appeared from another continent and began to broke or force away our land. Like Israel and Palestine, that dispossession and its well-told stories have woven itself into our fokelore for the Ancient and our spatial demographics for the Modern.

Different peoples have different views culturally. In Joburg North, I really don’t care if my land is in Lonehill or Fourways Gardens. Culturally I have no sensitivity at all; it is simply a suburb preference. But for others, a plot in Magoebaskloof is vital for family continuity and memories; even spiritual for millions of people. I’ll never forget learning about a culture of our Black people that if a relative dies away from home a ceremony takes place using a Buffulo Thorn branch at the scene of death. The branch is brushed over the ground in order to “catch up” the spirit of the deceased. The branch is then returned to their home and placed, say, in their room so that their spirit may settle in again. That may sound unusual to me, but how strange it is to see crosses and flowers at scenes of road accidents remembering a loved one’s place of death. On Saturday I went past such a shrine which has been there for years on the Hartebeespoort road and the large printed photo of the deceased is now pale and worn by the elements. Perhaps those left behind have moved on but even the road workers don’t clear the memorial.

So Land carries enormous cultural significance. Perhaps the best we can do is understand that the plot at Magoesbaskloof means the same to someone as the family home in Plettenberg Bay to another person. And the point is, millions are aggrieved by what is deemed to be dispossession and I’m not sure where the fight is going to end in the final analysis.

As a boy in Natal, I watched as the Whites were removed from Isipingo and replaced by Indians, there and others relocated to Chatsworth. At the same time, homelands were being boundaried and funded at great cost along tribal lines as best the government of the day understood it. As a consequence, we had upset Whites moving into the suburb where we stayed, Indians getting “prime land near the sea” and the strange so-called independent state of Bophuthatswana fragmented into many little “states”. Frankly, what a mess! But as a result today, we have Black First Land First and others, like our Hermanus Land First, making mayhem in our country.

Culture and Land intersect in agriculture. There’s something about the dry soil running through their hands that makes farmers love their Land. I think the same applies whatever race or nationality you belong to. Farming goes hand in hand with Food and therein lies the rub for all those who threaten and even attempt to kill off farmers; take the Land and you cull the production. Cull the production and you’d better get used to the feeling of sand running through your fingers because, frankly, that’s the only worth that land has.

If ever a Loser existed, Zimbabwe takes the trophy. Venezuela is too far away for any other than CNN to convey the mess, but our Northern neighbour is on our doorstep. Economically, southern Africa’s own Syria in which millions of people have suffered, the rich and skilled have emigrated and the poor have migrated. Tragic social engineering of a different kind; Land capture by a threatened, greedy State. God help us if we sink into land-for-pals’-votes in such a grotesque manner. Culture and votes drove the dispossession for the people, but hatred and assault drove the farmers away. With them went the food, sustenance and foreign currency of a nation – how stupid can you be! And we are not immune, Culture is the pretext for much of the Land political rhetoric but whether the politicians have a point or not, the end result is scorched earth. The notion that you can “take back the land” and not do inexorable damage to the nation is far-fetched. Just ask the estate agents who are now “stocked up” by sellers longing to sell at a reasonable price and not even getting any offers. And the politicians need to understand that the “end justifies the means” is nonsense when it comes to destroying for the sake of rebuilding. In my humble opinion, only war carries that logic as would be indicated in Germany who had the Marshall Plan to help restore it, and Japan who took Hiroshima from rubble to skyscrapers in 25 years in what was a display of intense national pride. Unfortunately, all we have managed to do in this country is take a grand old airline like SAA and bankrupt it while getting its baby brother, SAExpress, grounded. A very different intent and purpose. Land in Zimbabwe was given to the least deserving, ala Grace Mugabe, while the locals who received plots continued to live in un-supported, un-serviced squalor.

Culture is a prime driver of the value of land. It may not add much to its value commercially but it certainly drives peoples to want it or defend it, either even with their lives.

COMMERCIAL: This is the application of Land that many of us understand well. For the sake of it, this land comprises all land zoned Commercial or invariably, that land and buildings which houses factories and office space. The point is that this land derives its value from its rental income and rental contracts. For our benefit, we will include buy-to-let apartment units.

I remember when I first learned the word “Opportunities”. It took care of the Michaelangelo Towers example above. Essentially, an opportunity was the total cost of the land and the building divided by the total square meterage of the saleable floor space. The selling price then included a profit margin for the investor and/or developer. 100 units were 100 opportunities for sale.

This formula of total cost divided by floor space allows for a return on capital which is acceptable to those who have taken risk for the development. If all sold, the opportunities yielded many a handsome profit for developers. However, not too many developments have been plain sailing. I remember when Summercon developments came to a halt as electricity could not be guaranteed. Nobody offered an offset for development loan interest or the time cost of delay; those developments just “hung” as vacant land or part-finished properties. Very costly indeed. Then there is the development risk ie sales are not enough to cover costs and bonds and serious damage can occur. Fortunately, the banks understand the cashflow risk of developments and tend to nurse the developer through. Sometimes they will have taken equity in the hope of upside in which case they make themselves part of the solution.

Apart from capital profits – build 100, sell 100 – the primary form of returns is rental. This is where things really get interesting over long periods of time. The amount of the lease, the term of the lease and the quality of the tenant then play a huge role in the value of the property. Now its land and building cost is just that and only its value of the lease agreements give it any value whatsoever. After all, who wants to own an empty building in Claremont with crippling costs pumping through every month? The discounted cashflow of the net rentals becomes the source of value. That present value, after all operating and financial expenditure is the only value worth talking about. Of course, right now you may like Checkers as the anchor tenant but you may also be focussed around an Edgars as well. Better the former, for sure! We have a building in Hermanus with both and I often wonder what would happen if Edgars finally gives up the ghost. Of course in similar vein, it’s also interesting that the new Whale Coast mall has a flagship Checkers [Whitey Basson lives just down the road] and thus the mall store obviously cannibalises the village store. We often now hear of renegotiations of lease costs by major tenants in order to meet low economic activity. Each time, the owner of the complex takes a knock in their value. Vacancies also play havoc with these values over time.

Point is that commercial property has no “land” value per se. Only the net flows of income matter when it comes to determining the saleable value of the property.

But to see Culture and Commercialism come together roughly, we need look no further that the same Whale Coast mall. The locals believed that the land was earmarked for affordable housing and I have no reason from some Press articles of the time to deny their understanding. But the mall was built after an 8 year approval process. Needless to say, the mall was targeted and threated by marchers during the protests in no uncertain terms. I’m not sure what this underlying, unresolved issue will do to the mall’s value in the long-term; time will tell.

We will leave CAPITAL for next time……….

Yours in Property.

LAND (Part 1)

The issue of land predominates our thinking these days. In a short series under the name, we will explore some aspects of land and what gives it worth. I do not expect every reader to agree with me. Nor do I imagine that every reader will take from my opinion anything other than their own version of what remains the elusive truth of what really took place as a global phenomenon, namely, colonialism.

I was given a book by my Uncle Piet who presently lies in Gauteng quietly awaiting a long and kindly sleep to embrace him. In a sense, this blog is a tribute to this old man who has sunk more mine shafts and mined more gold ore than any other I know, but who also has managed to live a remarkable life. In addition to his wife and family, he too loved my wife and I.

To whet the appetite and get you thinking, I extract from the book by TV Bulpin, Lost Trails of the Transvaal, which was published in South Africa in October, 1956. I was just 19 months old then and a resident of then, Northern Rhodesia, now Zambia. When Uncle Piet gave it to me, I couldn’t wait to read its secrets. I learned that the lost trails are those ancient highways created probably initially by animals searching for water or seasonal grazing but later, expanded by pioneers and settlers of every kind, in search of grazing, or hunting, or something new underground, or the ever-elusive sea. Trade had become a force and supply lines needed to be shortened for the commercial gain of easy access to larger quantities and secure supply lines. Of course, there too were military operations that relied on the expansion of the trails for military execution.

Hope you enjoy the series and that it gives you a richer sense of what values property today…….

TV Bulpin writes in his Foreward:

The infinite patience and artistry of that old craftsman, Nature, has wrought upon the face of earth some wondrous themes and changes. With the resistless erosion of the elements as the principal tool, all manner of strange shapes have been ingeniously contrived. Deserts and mountains and oceans have been made and then, through some whim, the whole lot changed; the plateaux into seas; the seas into desert; and some longstanding geological systems of a magnitude staggering to mankind simply vanished away with a facility of a mis-spelt word being changed in a schoolchild’s lessons book.

That segment of the complex face of Africa lying between the Vaal and Limpopo rivers, and called the Transvaal, has known in full measure the sublime cycle of restless creation. Of the whole continent of Africa, in fact, there is no section possessing a greater variety of scenic marble; a more complex geological history; or a richer endowment bequeathed to it from the mineral treasure chest of providence.

With such a bait to lure man on, in a natural setting so magnificent, it would be surprising, indeed, if anything less had resulted than a human history of immense variety, restless movements, and all the varied passions which the presence of incalculable wealth can be expected to arouse.

To the Transvaal, in fact, has come a remarkable collection of human beings, attracted there from the ends of the earth in hope of finding their hearts desire of freedom or fortune in the wilderness.

…..and Bulpin continues into Chapter one:

Just who precisely were the first men to ever wonder across the face of the Transvaal remains unknown. The succession of prehistoric men whose remnants distract the scientists pass like phantom figures, brutal and bestial, through a nightmare that lasted for untold millions of years. Taung man, Rhodesian man, Boskop man; all had their epochs. None left anything lasting of themselves behind save a few bones to be accidentally found in the places which have given their kind of names. From creatures more animal than man, they changed to creatures more man than animal. And then, at last, some 15000 years ago, the people loosely known as the Bushmen, came to displace and absorb the last of the really elementary humans, the so-called, Boskop men.

These Bushmen migrants from the north must have found the Transvaal on the threshold of the present topographical shape. Enormous changes had warped and modelled the landscape through ages of time. It had been left eroded into two principal regions differing widely in their attitude and associated climate and varieties of flora and animal life.

The lowest region, averaging some 2500 feet above the level of the sea, was a place of dense Acacia bush in its southern reaches and changing in the north across the Tropic of Capricorn to that wilderness of Mopani trees which stretches off for 2000 miles across the heart of central Africa. Africa must have been very new. Its face was covered with an explosive rash of volcanoes and their furnace glow must have made the nights a phantom sight.

The second region of the Transvaal, the northern end of the high lying central South African plateau which projects over the Vaal river, is totally different from the Bushveld. Rising up to 7651 feet in its highest point (the Steenkampsberg), it is in an open wind-swept prairie with little to break its spacious sweep save an occasional rocky ridge or hillock, or one of the shallow, hard dried out lakelets known as pans.  These pans, especially those around the principal Transvaal specimen of its kind, the 6 mile long Lake Chrissie, have a curious geological history. Some of them seem to be relics of ancient river drainage systems, long since disrupted by changes in the landscape.

It is underground, indeed, that the principal features of the Highveld are found. The most phenomenal of all these features is without doubt the elevated ridge which forms the northern watershed of the highveld. This ridge, the famed Witwatersrand, or ridge of white waters, consists of the surface crust of a sandwich of reefs 25000 feet wide and of unplumbed depth. In the midst of this sandwich, like a layer of jam, is the 2000 feet wide main reef which, for 70 years, has supplied the bulk of the world’s gold.

It was over this varied land that the simple Bushmen wandered. With no clue at all of the marvels beneath their feet they hunted the game and lived unchecked by anything save the rivalries and squabbles of their own contrivance. About 1000 years after Christ, the first Bantu started to drift in from the north. Offshoots of the Karanga people of Rhodesia began to arrive in the shape of minor clans and groups of individuals shaken off from the main body by some domestic row or disagreement between factions. These groups of people carried with them into the Transvaal some of that peculiar knowledge of building with stone and working with metal which has made their parent tribal group so famous in Africa. Subsequent migrations and conquests have largely disrupted these early settlers and, in any case, they were never particularly numerous; but behind them they have left memories and mysteries that can never die.

Then in the early 1900’s, a European hermit of the wilderness, Bernard Francis Lotrie, known as “The Wild Lotrie”, took up his residence in a shack by the banks of the Limpopo close to the forbidden hill, The Hill of the Jackal. This Lotrie was a curious soul. Born in Grahamstown in 1825, the son a French botanist sent to South Africa by Napoleon, he was a man of some education.

Bulpin then continues to relate stories of all the ancient tribes who occupied the Transvaal (obviously, now Gauteng), their life routines, their disagreements and their places of worship. Suffice to say, for generations these people lived on their mountain, and then, with later invasions of alien people to the district, they dispersed and merged with their neighbours on the plain. Many of the place names the old Sotho settlers gave to the land still exist. In past years the Magaliesberg was known to the first English hunters and traders as the Cashan Mountains, from the name of the chief Khasane of the Taung section of the tribe who lived there. Later, when the Voortrekkers arrived, they found the chief Mohale or Magali of the 6aPo tribe resting there; and hence came the new name for the Magaliesberg.

I will not be drawn into the debate of who was there or where first. Frankly, the Bushmen [San, Khoisan] seem to be the first as, in fact, was the finding of Jan van Riebeeck in 1652 in the Cape. Another historical fact is that the Europeans, by their very name, were always second and the debate of where they found empty spaces or settled tribes is unknown in the detail required to make it significant. It is simply too factious for me to enter into; nor is it relevant to this series.

But this much I will venture, if we could find a way to allow the past to only influence our good in a spirit of mutual belonging, mutual respect, and mutual co-operation, then this beautiful, tortured country of ours could be great among the nations.

Yours in Property.

HALF-YEAR 30 JUNE 2019

Hard to believe half the year has flown by!

It has been loaded with politics including a national election and the finalisation of parliament, economic data for the first quarter that sucks at -3.2% GDP growth, SOEs’ revelations every day that boggle the mind, defamation claims that seem to have become lawfare, and emigration statistics that leave you reeling. Never a dull moment in SA Inc.

That said, we have survived and even Donald and China seem to be reaching some agreement. Hauwei or Meiwei is Donald’s Wei but I Mustsei, he currently has the best stock exchange performance in the world – often in excess of 15% with the Nasdaq flying. And then there is the Brexit “Deal or No Deal” show which, with the weakest Bachelor I have ever seen, has had us glued to the screen more than Netflix. I never knew I would binge on Theresa May – flicking from her to Deputy Chief Justice Zondo more times than a fly escapes its swatter. Never a dull moment in world politics either.

Our property market has moved sideways and getting a positive article out of anyone that I didn’t think was simply “talking it up” has been really hard. But out there, hard-working men and women have made ends meet and sold and sold despite the push-back of the market. That it is a buyers’ market, there is no doubt but even getting a buyer to bite has been tricky. You can’t do deals with people walking through your show-house; you actually need an offer to make a negotiation possible. My friend who has had 25 couples come through his house in two months feels exactly what I’m talking about. But I must say, both from a rate and an approval point of view, the banks have remained really good. No shut down from them and truly, they hold the key to continued sales and borrowing. If we can just hold Eskom solvent, we have a good chance of emerging from the mess we are in. Heaven help us, please!

Getting technical for a moment, I received a good article in Businesstech, 29 June 2019, quoting Tobie Fourie, National Rentals manager, Chas Everitt and entitled, New South African rental laws may be implemented soon – these are the changes you need to know about, that gave some good insight for those of us owning buy-to-lets or in the rental business. Some extracts:

Top of FormBottom of Form

The Rental Housing Amendment Act will be implemented soon. The ‘new’ Act – which was actually passed in 2014 – contains the most recent amendments to the Rental Housing Act of 1999, which is still in force.

 

The act currently governs the overall relationship between tenant and landlord and sets out their statutory rights and obligations and aims to clarify certain aspects of the older Act that have given rise to many differences of interpretation.

 

The main provisions that landlords and tenants need to be aware of include:

  • It will become compulsory for lease agreements between the landlord and the tenant to be in writing and legally enforceable.
  • All sections of the lease and any explanations and definitions it contains will need to be explained to the tenants and understood before the document is signed.
  • It will be the landlord’s responsibility to ensure that the rental property is in a habitable state, which is in line with the existing Rental Housing Act.
  • The landlord will be responsible for maintaining the rental property and will have to ensure that it has access to basic services such as water and electricity.
  • Only the local authority will be permitted to cut off services to non-paying tenants.
  • No tenant may be prevented from entering the rental property or denied access to the rental property without a court order.
  • A joint inspection by the landlord and tenant has to be done on the commencement of the lease period, and if the landlord does not participate in this inspection, no part of the tenant’s deposit for repairs or damages may be withheld when the tenant leaves.
  • A defect list will have to form part of the lease agreement as an annexure.
  • When the deposit is paid back to the tenants, the interest earned on that deposit must also be paid to the tenant within seven days of the expiration of the lease, subject to any deductions for damages.

 

Landlords who fail comply with these and other requirements within six months of the new legislation coming into force could be liable to pay a fine or even face a jail sentence for non-compliance.

 

“And these legal complexities will make it all the more important for landlords to appoint reputable, reliable, knowledgeable, qualified and legally registered rental management agents to assist them and ensure they remain compliant”, said Fourie.

 

Let’s face it, if you are letting a premises that is not habitable, without a written lease and for which you do not have an inspection list at the beginning and the willingness to fix problems that arise, you should not be a landlord. On the other hand, good landlords have always paid some interest on deposits as they have earned [read: saved] interest if they took the money and put it in their bond on the property. But, there is the nagging feeling that letting is carrying more and more onus on the landlord to be proven right and the tenant to be proven wrong. Having said this, I can honestly say I have never had a bad tenant. Those of you who have will tell me to be very grateful, I know.

 

We enter the second half. Hopefully our politics settles down and the Zondo Commission provides an interim report on glaring state capture and we have a rate decrease. Then if we can hold onto our investment grade from Moody’s and fund enough of Eskom to keep the lights on, we may be through the first part of the drift. It’s knife edge to be honest but failure is also not an option.

 

Neither is pessimism. I understand how you feel believe me but one thing I know from personal experience is that all the worry in the world does not move you forward. Worry is like sitting on a rocking chair thinking you’re moving. You’re not; you’re just standing still and getting weaker every day, physically and emotionally. Cut it out and remind me to do the same if I lapse back. Homeloan Junction is in the same boat as you, nothing more and nothing less. We are here to support you to the best of our ability and are onside to help you succeed. Success to you in the second half!! – the same success we wish ourselves.

 

Yours in Property.

 

INTERESTING THOUGHTS ABOUT PROPERTY

This blog covers a few interesting aspects of property ownership and investment. Hope you enjoy the read.

Renting has always been an option. For some, it is the only option given their inability to afford a bond but it is also for some an ownership alternative and lifestyle choice. In a recent [5 June 2019] article in The Business Insider, It is now cheaper to rent a home in Gauteng and the Western Cape than a year ago, James de Villiers explores the cost of renting in the Cape and Gauteng.

“The average rent charged in the Western Cape declined by R94 between the first quarter of 2018 and the first quarter of 2019, and by R64 in Gauteng, rental payment platform PayProp‘s numbers show. This as Statistics South Africa on Tuesday announced that the country’s GDP declined by 3.2% in the same quarter. 

When PayProp’s Rental Index for the first quarter of 2019 is compared to its 2018 rental index, it shows that the average rent in South Africa stood at R7551 a month in the first quarter of 2019, compared to R7610 a year before, a R59 decline. 

PayProp said most national rentals (31.7%) in the first quarter were in the R5000 to R7500 bracket; 22.3% in the R2500 to R5000 bracket, and 18.4% in the R7500 to R10000 bracket.

The average national distribution of rental properties across price bands (supplied, PayProp) 

The average national distribution of rental properties across price bands (supplied, PayProp)

Rent in the Western Cape, the country’s most expensive rental province, stood at an average of R9030 per month for the first quarter of 2019 compared to R9124 in 2018.

The Western Cape is followed by Gauteng where the average rent is estimated to be R8000 compared to R8064 in 2018. 

The Northern Cape saw the sharpest decline in average rent from R8153 in 2018 to R7817 in the first quarter of 2019 – a R336 decline. 

It is followed by KwaZulu-Natal where rent declined by R154 from R8129 a month in 2018 to R7975 in 2019. 

The Free State is one of three provinces which saw an increase, with average monthly rentals increasing from R5942 to R6054. 

Mpumalanga saw the second biggest increase, from R7248 to R7298.

Mpumalanga saw the second biggest increase, from R7248 to R7298

Johette Smuts, data and analytics head at PayProp South Africa, expects the average national rent to increase in the next few months as uncertainty remains in the South African economy. 

“Generally, uncertainty decreases consumer confidence, which could leave property buyers reluctant to commit in coming months, effectively dampening demand and putting downward pressure on prices,” Smuts said. “Meanwhile, all these prospective buyers need to live somewhere, and they’ll most likely be forced to rent a property, thus increasing demand for rental properties and pushing up prices.” 

 

The bottom line of this article is that:

  • Little change has occurred in the average cost of rentals in the period. As a landlord, I would be concerned with that as the normal 8-10% is obviously not applying. Could the renters be saturated? If so, not good news for the landlords.
  • As usual, the only good news of stagnant property prices for landlords is that they get an equal or better return on their property as rentals rise. This equals out at point in time as the rental less ever-rising service costs, eventually begins to eat away at yields. Time to sell then, especially as I found that yields in no-hassle, risk-free investments were better than the risk-fraught rental market.

Extracts from the next article have been overcome by recent events that seem to confront our President. However, BIZNEWS 12 June 2019, in their article by Theuns Eloff, the Chairman of the Board of Advisors of the FW de Klerk Foundation, Give Ramaphosa a chance, there is light in this dark tunnel, has this to say:

One can almost feel the despair of the South African population. Many South Africans are asking, “What is Cyril doing about this? He is the President now!”

And that’s partly true – our President is in a better place than a year ago as far as party politics are concerned. He followed up his victory at Nasrec (53%) with a 57.5% victory at the polls in May. He is no longer an “interim” President, but one that has led his party to a victory (and probably single-handedly rescued them from a defeat). But, unfortunately, it doesn’t mean he is untouchable and can do what he wants.

There are a few stumbling blocks on his path. And to understand what’s happening now, one needs to know what these stumbling blocks are. There are still Zuma supporters in the Cabinet Only Ramaphosa’s leadership and drive will force them to take action. 

The second stumbling block is that, though there may be a new Cabinet, the people who will apply (hopefully) new policies, are still the same old officials – and the majority of them are the product of the toxic mixture of racial transformation and cadre deployment. It will take time to get better officials appointed on merit. Proper lifestyle audits are the only way in which the corrupt can be shown the door in the medium and long term.

Thirdly, it would still take longer to make a significant difference at the local level – that is how the three spheres of government work across the world. President Ramaphosa’s (and any President before and after him) ability to relieve the Mayor and Councillors of a completely dysfunctional municipality such as Lekwa (Standerton) of their duties, are extremely limited. In terms of Lekwa, which no longer even has the capacity to pump enough water for the community and businesses only a few kilometres from the Vaal River, and where the homeless sleep in the municipality’s offices at night, he can only work through the (also inept) provincial government and ANC structures. And it takes time…

The fourth stumbling block is that President Ramaphosa faces serious opposition from within his own ranks. The current face of this opposition is the ANC Secretary-General, Ace Magashule. He unleashed the current storm within the ANC through unsolicited statements about a changed mandate for the Reserve Bank. They can conspire together in the short term but also the medium term, with a view to the ANC’s internal processes and election conference that lies ahead in 2022.

Against the backdrop of these stumbling blocks on Ramaphosa’s path, one should never have expected the damage of the nine wasted Zuma years to be reversed soon. President Ramaphosa cannot put Ace in jail, as there are legal proceedings to be followed. President Ramaphosa also cannot just show Ace the door – he was elected by the ANC’s elective conference. Only when Ace is found guilty of a crime, can he be replaced as Secretary-General.

What can be done? President Ramaphosa has three “power blocs” in which to operate. Each of these three power blocs is unique, and like circles, they overlap.

The first power bloc the is ANC’s headquarters in Luthuli House. This is where Ramaphosa’s party political mandate comes from – and he can’t alienate himself from the majority of his own party. As a result of the outcome of the Nasrec election conference (and specifically the election of Ace Magashule as Secretary-General and Jessie Duarte as Deputy Secretary-General) he is not in charge of Luthuli House. He will have to take this factor into consideration and manage it at all times. 

The second power block consists of the Legislature and the Executive: Parliament and the Cabinet. Here Ramaphosa is in control, with the majority of the ANC parliamentarians and Cabinet supporting him – even if only because he is now firmly seated in the presidential chair. He can use this power bloc effectively, but still cannot act against the wishes of the majority ANC caucus members. This is where Ramaphosa has real power.

The third power bloc is that of the Constitution and its institutions. This includes the Chapter 9 institutions (such as the Public Protector, the Human Rights Commission and others). It also includes the judicial authority of the courts, especially the Constitutional Court. President Ramaphosa’s mandate as president of the country comes from the Constitution, not from the ANC. This power bloc is probably the strongest and can be very effectively used by Ramaphosa.

The way President Ramaphosa manages these three power blocs will play a decisive role in his success (or failure). He will have to make use of the power blocs where he is in control, or where he has a strong mandate, to neutralise the power bloc of Luthuli House. President Ramaphosa will have to play this ongoing game of chess and the underlying power struggle while he works against the other stumbling blocks to his reform strategy. It is no easy task, and will take time and require excellent timing.

What does this mean to ordinary South Africans? Take these stumbling blocks and power blocs into consideration in your assessment of our country’s current situation. It is not an ideal situation, but through it, there can be progress made towards a better South Africa. Do your job and look after your responsibilities, among other things by taking even better care of your own and others’ safety. Recognise that millions of other South Africans feel like you do, have the same concerns, and at times, much worse experiences. Above all, keep a cool head – there’s light in this dark tunnel.”

I appreciate an article like this for I share with many people the frustration of the pace of change. I often come across a general distrust in every aspect of the government, including the President. However, when I read of the complexities he faces, the latest being the appointment of questionable Chairs of parliamentary committees, and the Public Protector’s antics [or, is she onto something?], I realise that my opinions should be tempered by his realities as he must be a President and a politician in a toxic environment that he has inherited. Strength to your arm, Mr President, and may right prevail over wrong.

Point is, that as long as all this stuff leads to policy uncertainty and while Malema insists that by year-end all land must be transferred to the State, the economy will continue to falter and even collapse. We truly live on a precipice.

Now here’s an interesting and novel article to end with:

“Property stokvel buys its first 5.8ha piece of land

BY XOLILE MTSHAZO – 02 April 2019 – 10:08

 

After only launching in May last year with a membership of 30 potential investors, the Rustenburg Property Investment Stokvel has grown to 90 members and has already purchased a 5.8ha piece of land worth R5m that is ready to be serviced.

The property stokvel is the brainchild of investment pundit Lebo Ratema, who brought most of her clients – people that she knew – under one roof to get their buy-in to start investing in property.

“As an investor I have the information and the data. I then talked around most of my friends and people that I knew were interested to put our heads together and create wealth,” explains Ratema.

“Many of my clients had been declined by the banks. Some had made mistakes and had been taken advantage of because of their lack of knowledge and know-how to get into the property investment business.”

Ratema is ecstatic with the progress made as Rustenburg Property Investment Stokvel has grown from 30 to 90 members in less than a year.

Each member holds 100 shares sold to them.

Every member has a choice of three investment options. The first option is over three years, the second over four and the last over five years. If you opt to invest over a three-year period you contribute R5,500 monthly, over four years R4,125 and over five years R3,300.

“We have different voluntary contribution and payment plans to suit every member to be able to purchase shares.

“This is not a one-man initiative. I must emphasise that we have a 10-member-strong committee in charge of running the whole project. All of them have signing powers.”

Ratema said the land they are ready to develop is where they are based, in Rustenburg, but the whole project of servicing the land costs R19m, before the actual building of the housing

 

“The rezoning of the land will be completed within a year as we are now busy with proclamations and servicing the land.

“The development of infrastructure like roads, electricity and water must be factored in.”

Ratema and other stokvel members have been liaising with property experts and property management companies who will help manage the properties.

She said the stokvel is open to everyone who aspires to invest in property.

Ratema warned that the project was not a get-rich-quick scheme but a long-term investment. She said members would start getting dividends from their investment once the first house is sold and would share the profit, depending on the number of shares a member has bought.

“Once the last house has been sold and every member has been given their share dividend, we will dissolve the investment stokvel and start all over again.”

 

If Ratema can pull this off, one wonders how novel this model could be and how scaleable it could become. Let’s hope we get some ongoing Press coverage to track the progress.

 

And finally, an old friend is quoted in BUSINESSTECH’s 22 JUNE 2019 article, Luxury homes in South Africa are now selling for a ‘bargain’:Top of Form

Bottom of Form

“Luxury home prices are generally declining in many of South Africa’s most sought-after suburbs, and sellers are more willing to negotiate.

Citing recent FNB statistics, the property group noted that the rate of home price growth on the Atlantic Seaboard – South Africa’s most expensive area – has dropped from a high of 25.5% in the first quarter of 2016 to -5.1% in the first quarter of 2019.

“The rate of home price growth on the Atlantic Seaboard, which is South Africa’s most expensive area, has fallen from a high of 25.5% in the first quarter of 2016 to -5.1% in the first quarter of this year,” said Rory O’Hagan, head of the luxury portfolio division of the Chas Everitt International property group.

“House prices in the Southern Suburbs, including areas like Constantia, Bishopscourt, Newlands and Claremont are currently declining at the rate of 2.4% a year, after reaching a peak annual growth rate of 15.4% in 2015.”

O’Hagan said that he has seen similar drops in Gauteng and other parts of the country.

In Hyde Park, for example, brand new cluster homes that were on for sale at R28 million are now priced at R20 million, and a home originally listed for R19 million is now available for R15 million, he said.

“Our luxury portfolio teams in estates such as Val de Vie in the Cape Winelands and Zimbali on the KZN North Coast report a similar trend, with asking prices on specific homes dropping in the past month from R16.9 million to R13 million; from R15.9 million to R12 million; and from R13.9 million to R11.5 million.”

O’Hagan said that for luxury buyers planning to upgrade to a bigger property can acquire more home for their money in the current market. He said that appetite for luxury property around the world – including South Africa – is currently also being boosted by volatility in equity markets, which traditionally prompts investors to turn to brick and mortar.”

So now you too can live with the rich and famous. No longer do you need R25m to buy your dream home, R17.8m will do the trick 🙂 Just joking, Rory!

Property remains interesting and there is never a dull moment. We swing from luxury houses, to “give the President a chance”, to stokvels beginning to invest and rentals beginning to flatten out. What could be more interesting than property? Well, with all that said, I’m off to the cliffs to see if I can sight a whale. If I was on Twitter and a cook, I’d post a recipe like our Minister of Finance. 🙂

Yours in Property.

HOME OWNERSHIP

As my first blog after the LIFE series, I need to be careful of my mood. It could influence the way I present myself.

On 2 May, ABSA published its Home Ownership Sentiment and it has made interesting reading amongst other documents that flow across my desk. It has found itself sandwiched between four important announcements: the outcome of the election, the GDP growth number for Q1:2019, the SARB MPC decision, and the composition of Cabinet. May I say that another really interesting and unfolding story is the resignations of unsuccessful MP’s from President Ramaphosa’s government? Perhaps a comment on that later.

“Gevang met a slap riem”, the saying goes. ABSA, and frankly every economist I have read, was caught out by the -3.2% GDP growth in the first quarter economy. Some expected negative growth, but at the beginning of 2019 we were preoccupied deciding whether the year’s GDP growth would be more than or less than 1%. The news “klapped” us, using another lekker Afrikaans idiom. All of a sudden, we have revised, from the IMF to Moody’s and the others, down to below 1% for the year. No Ramaphoria this time round, but I must be honest, I felt sorry for him. Imagine fighting a grueling election campaign where your front and your back are exposed, to hear this news. Goodness me, it must have been tough! But, on the other hand, a huge wake-up call that, frankly, the ANC and its constituents have not even yet heard. Bottom line, ABSA had no inkling as at 2 May either when they projected 1.3% growth.

Secondly and briefly [see blog: Election 2019] for the sake of context, the Election results were really mixed. The ANC at its lowest majority, the DA bleeding but retaining the Cape, the EFF positive, and new kids like ATM [I do not know whether to say “appropriate” or “unfortunate” when it comes to this abbreviation for the African Transformation Movement] and Good [“cute”, I thought] in parliament. And now the broad swipe at the DA as “Auntie” Patricia takes over Public Works….. Fact is by all accounts, that CR gave the ANC this 58% break but it was not enough to silence his critics and we’ve seen the truth of that almost every day in the Press.

Thirdly, the SARB decision. Remaining the same was a good one but more enlightening was the dovish sentiment around inflation and rates. Inflation rises on strong demand and there isn’t any; frankly, I get the sense that only Financial Services are flying. Growth in the Manufacturing, Mining and Agricultural sectors was down -5%, -8% and -13% respectively. That’s a crisis in any other country and so it is here – the only good news is that it softens inflation. What emanates from that is the SARB saying that with inflationary pressures being weak, they may be able to reduce interest rates in order to stimulate economic growth. Sad that a crisis leads to rate reductions but we’ll take it, won’t we? By the way, this possibility is against the backdrop of all the major banks calling rates to remain the same for the balance of the year.

And finally, the composition of the Cabinet. In Election 2019, I wrote:

I think he will produce a Cabinet who are worthy to represent us. I also happen to think that Cyril Ramaphosa is the best person in the country for the job and, heaven knows, he better be and he better be selected. Anyone less would be a national body blow of titanic proportions. I think he will reduce the Cabinet but he will not be able to ignore everybody who we may consider tainted by some misdemeanor; he just won’t have that luxury right now but having said that, he needs to try. We will know in the next few days.

We know now. He has been selected and I’m relieved after the sensationalism of May’s coverage. However, he was not able to drastically reduce Cabinet and shave much-needed cost reductions. Nor was he able to leave some people out despite coverage to the contrary. Mr. President knows he needs to watch his back as many seem to not have it. That said, what do you think all these resignations are about? Apart from Jeff Radebe who is going to enjoy a “more normal life”, the rest all feel like they are resigning in a fit of pique. The useless ones and the not so useless ones have decided to throw in the towel. I guess it’s quite hard to mix with the riff-raff MP’s when you’ve been a Minister; but, on the other hand, they may feel that they have had their genius and competence overlooked by their panoptic [read: seeing the whole at one view, a word I recently read in a mega-cynical article on the Cabinet size and choices] President. Whatever their reasons, individual or corporate, I trust there is nothing sinister lurking in their choices. Fact is the Cabinet is too big to save costs but reduced enough to demonstrate the need. In the final analysis, the vote of these members could prove more important to CR than what they cost and in any case, what they accomplish for their salary and perks is more important than what they draw from your and my tax revenues – nothing costs more than incompetence and corruption.

So, to return to the Ownership Sentiment paper, everything is down quarter-on-quarter. The sense of buyers being willing to buy because prices are cheaper is offset – in Hermanus at least – by the fact that people are not buying. A live example: A beautifully renovated house 800m from us was on the market for R6.9m. Reduced to R6.5m, they have had a “cheeky” offer of R5.6m cash which is under cost. In 6 weeks 23 couples have viewed the house with only this offer presented. Everybody else liked and left the house. One year ago, this house would have been snapped up in two months at little discount to the asking price. What is real is that politics and economics intersect to create Confidence. At the moment, that intersect is just too low for the commitment that confidence brings.

But there is one silver lining to this cloud and that is the banks’ willingness to lend. I am really impressed at the conversion ratio, whether by “first bank” or “secondary bank”, of homeloan applications and by the rates on offer. There is no doubt that things could be worse. The banks are bringing their part in this property market. We appreciate that sincerely.

2019 was never going to be easy. Elections were the big gorilla but now he is sitting in the corner resting. I guess that leaves us in the room. Are we going to join him, sulking, complaining, wondering and wandering? The temptation is to find the reason why “it’s hard”. But please, don’t! Get up, look up and press on – if you don’t, someone else will and you will become the double-loser. That must not happen! This too will pass……..

Yours in Property.

ENTREPRENEURSHIP

Second last article in the LIFE series and now I’m going to discuss entrepreneurship with entrepreneurs.

Yes, you and you……..

If your job includes:

Setting up a business in the hope of making a profit,

then you are an entrepreneur.

I would put to you that every bond originator, estate agent, principal or a plethora of other occupations that employ you and/or others where the income ranges from commission to fat profits, is an entrepreneur. Anyone who is self-employed is probably an entrepreneur but anyone who is employed can be an intrapreneur and we’ll mention your role below. Bottom-line, the attributes of an entrepreneur can be applied whether you have your own business, work for a boss, or wish you didn’t and you intend to find your way out.

So as not to preach to the converted, let me start with drive. In this context, it probably means that you have done it on your own, want to do it on your own or, at least, think you can do it on your own. You know my old adage, you want to employ people who believe that they could employ themselves. That makes a boss uncomfortable and employee wide awake to opportunity. It raises the creative tension on how the boss treats you and how you treat the opportunities in her business. You want to learn and achieve, she wants productivity so she’s teaching you, exposing you, stretching you and eventually, unless you have something to stay for, you could find yourself as a blue-blood entrepreneur. With that cycle established, it’s not surprising that entrepreneurship includes:

  • A new business
  • A drive to succeed
  • A risk
  • A profit motive.

Those of us who’ve done it, know that profits are a by-product of sweaty hands and foreheads, also called “stress”, so let’s tone it down a little. Like you get the Health Warning on TV in a stunt act “don’t try this at home”, never think entrepreneurship is easy. If it is, you’re probably one of many who have tried and failed, or succeeded. If they failed, beware unless you know why. And, if they succeeded, beware because competition does not let you in easily. Ask Luyt Lager, Top TV et al. They thought they could win, but ran out of steam; admirable effort but a loss. On the other hand, Blue Label Telecoms entered the market of telecommunications when it looked impossible to succeed against the giants and they won a profitable share. Every estate agent and bond originator has the same story and I guarantee, to a greater or lesser degree, they have succeeded along similar principles.

You need to risk it. You could spend another’s money and he would forgive you, but deep down there must have been something to lose. Whether it’s your own, the bank’s or someone else’s or a mixture, honour should come into play. It’s wonderful to win but it’s horrible to lose. Risking it is not for fools and remember, once you have, the Law of Unintended Consequences kicks in. The best laid plans of mice and men, cannot foresee all that may happen. Normal risks around profit margins, turnover, costs etc. can be built into models, but those which you cannot see are a blow to the financial solar plexus. Expect them, whatever they are, but just as importantly, know that they will be there and suss them out from people in business or in your industry of choice before you venture in. Homework is the best work before you take the plunge; you will not be sorry. Linked to this financial aspect is the size of the downside. I remember going into BondExcel and signing a lease for our building [I drove past it the other day in Republic Road with fond memories]. Round figures, it was R4000 for 6 months, or R24000. Knowing we had earned nothing yet, I can tell you that was an enormous decision for me. But that angst taught me something which I’ll simply express like my mother taught me, Look after the pennies and the Pounds will look after themselves. Or, put another way, because we turned every cent, the Rands came in due course.

The idea and the intellect and the drive need to match. In the old days, a guy by the name of Tony Factor set up a retail store in central Joburg in the 70’s. Open to correction, I believe he made some money selling false teeth in London but he was dyslexic; he really battled to read and write. However, he managed to become the discount king of South Africa when discounts were “unpopular” and Factor’s Discounters was a beautiful building in Pritchard Street, if I recall. The point is, Tony had an idea and all the skill to drive it home despite his inability to read or write properly. You see, entrepreneurs are not brilliant, they just know what they can do, what they can’t do and what they must do. If one of those things are missing and you can afford to ‘buy it in”, stay in your day-job, please. One of the rules from Tom Peter’s Thriving on Chaos fame was “stick to your knitting” i.e. do anything as long as it was somewhere in your skill set. I’ll never forget buying RMD Meats though – I could braai so I bought a meat factory – crazy but true. Suffice to say, we knew how to run a business, knew a little about Retail and making customers happy but did we sweat learning about all kinds of meat – cutting a Fillet into 200ml steaks and hiding the “tail” in the batch of “eyes” and then vacuum-packing and labeling every packet before sending them out to restaurants across Gauteng. I loved the time for learning something completely different, but if you want to “buy a butcher”, beware! As another example, we have a restaurant in town that was built and owned by two locals who are very well known and brilliant at what they do. Sadly, they have just sold to new out-of-town owners and I would wager they will not last 6 months. Going into winter and losing the turnover of friends of the sellers is going to cost them dearly; I really hope not for their sake. To summarise, a good idea, needs to be thought through and then driven to success otherwise it and I will not be entrepreneurial.

I think we all understand profit. That lovely stuff when you have sold lots at the right margin and everybody has been ready, willing and able to pay you on time. The experts may say that I’m mixing up profits and cash flow, but until you’ve invested your own money in a business, you won’t understand how the two become one continuous cycle in your head. Like the picture of the little guy sitting on his potty, the jobs not over ‘til the paperwork’s done. However, there is one type of entrepreneur that I really do admire these days and that is the Social entrepreneur. Many kinds of business abound like the guy in Somerset West who produces a “dry powder shower”. Fascinating but very necessary when you consider being in a drought for 6 years in Southerland. Another lady I read of is making handbags from tea bags and exporting her art-bags overseas. How many more – all plastic recycling, a social worker building shacks, bee-keeping, bamboo clothing – are out there making profit by being good to the environment and her people? What an amazing achievement by people who are pulling themselves up by their own bootstraps!

So what does it take to be an entrepreneur? Here are some thoughts without repeating those above:

  • A great idea or the drive to be better than the competition.
  • Vision. Begin with the end in mind; you’ll need to in times of “why did I do this”?
  • Never-give-up spirit.
  • Funding. Or a carefully crafted business plan for funders. If you can’t encapsulate it, you can’t expect anyone to give you money.
  • Support. Friends, business colleagues and professionals; most come at a price but all are needed from time to time.
  • Business acumen. Making profit is not making money, collecting cash and more debtors than expenses and creditors, is.
  • Being prepared to start small and grow. Ego has no place in entrepreneurialism; it may get you in but it can also terminate you if allowed to dominate your business.
  • Others. Partners, if you have, and people who trust you to deliver. People will jump with you if you have a plan with a vision and medicine-fills of enthusiasm. People are willing to follow visionary leaders.
  • Risk management. You’ll need it an hour after risk-taking.
  • Un-burnt bridges. I know your boss may have peeved you but the world is small. Become an entrepreneur with a forward-looking motive rather than an “I can’t wait to get out of here” attitude. Of course many people have done so, and probably my best example was Bill Venter, the founder of Altron and Powertech. The latter company, if my memory serves me correctly, he told his boss he would buy “one day” and he did. But I think they’re few and far between and in any case, why not be happy and positive while you’re working hard to succeed?

And by the way, Intrepreneurs do all of this in the context of their work. Right at work, fresh ideas implemented are driving bosses to realize the gems they have behind the desks in their offices. That symbiosis of real recognition for really good effort is occurring every day. If not, the boss may realize money talks but talent walks.

If ever there was an entrepreneur that I admire, he’s Vincent. As I’ve shared before, he joined BondExcel 2 weeks before I left Nedbank, survived sub-Prime on a farm breeding puppies [which he no longer does!!], re-built the Homeloan Junction business off a nearly zero-base and then started his Vape Junction. Unassuming, but a risk-taker of note. Humble yet efficient, he is people-centered to the point of care beyond the call of duty and sometimes to the point that it hurts. So, when we say “talk to us” it’s not because we think we’re cool know-it-all’s but rather that along the way of business life, we’ve learnt a few lessons that you don’t need to endure if you just ask.

Here’s to entrepreneurs, fearless men and women who get up every morning and make business and employment happen at financial risk to themselves. Clem Suntner says of you:

 

“I’m not saying that you shouldn’t focus while you’re running a business but you should have that radar system that is able to capture different possible futures and when they start occurring against expectations, that you have the ability to adapt.”

 

Yours in Property.